Funny photos

[tatamata 2]

ali ovaj bez ABS-a ima kraći zaustavni put

[ivan.ik 625]

Za pesak i sneg je bolje kad malo blokira točak, dokazali ovi iz Bosch-a.

[miske17 0]

[kicerica 5]

[Dr. Tuborg 37]

[Mijailović P. 3450]

:stuart: :stuart: :stuart: :stuart: :stuart:

[beli_Punto 123]

[integralac 2566]

pismeni kinezi

[Tomas 10]

[nebojsa01 0]

[Woodoo 22985]

[chikavili 511]

pismeni kinezi

Imaju moji roditelji zidni sat star preko 30 godina koji ima isto napisanu cetvorku, nije to nista cudno, niti ima veze sa kinezima

A evo sta kaze wikipedia na tu temu:

"IIII" on clocks

Clock faces that are labeled using Roman numerals conventionally show IIII for four o'clock and IX for nine o'clock, using the subtractive principle in one case and not the other. There are many suggested explanations for this:

• Many clocks use IIII because that was the tradition established by the earliest surviving clock, the Wells Cathedral clock built between 1386 and 1392. It used IIII because that was the typical method used to denote 4 in contemporary manuscripts (as iiij or iiii). That clock had an asymmetrical 24-hour dial and used Arabic numerals for a minute dial and a moon dial, so theories depending on a symmetrical 12-hour clock face do not apply.
  
• Perhaps IV was avoided because IV represented the Roman god Jupiter, whose Latin name, IVPPITER, begins with IV. This suggestion has been attributed to Isaac Asimov.
  
• Louis XIV, king of France, who preferred IIII over IV, ordered his clockmakers to produce clocks with IIII and not IV, and thus it has remained.
  
• Using standard numerals, two sets of figures would be similar and therefore confusable by children and others unused to reading clockfaces: IV and VI are similar, as are IX and XI. As the first pair are upside down on the face, an additional level of confusion would be introduced—a confusion avoided by using IIII to provide a clear distinction from VI.
  
• The four-character form IIII creates a visual symmetry with the VIII on the other side, which the two-character IV would not.
  
• With IIII, the number of symbols on the clock totals twenty Is, four Vs, and four Xs, so clock makers need only a single mould with a V, five Is, and an X in order to make the correct number of numerals for their clocks: VIIIIIX. This is cast four times for each clock and the twelve required numerals are separated:
  
  • V IIII IX
    
  • VI II IIX
    
  • VII III X
    
  • VIII I IX
    

The IIX and one of the IXs are rotated 180° to form XI and XII. The alternative with IV uses seventeen Is, five Vs, and four Xs, requiring the clock maker to have several different patterns.

• Only the I symbol would be seen in the first four hours of the clock, the V symbol would only appear in the next four hours, and the X symbol only in the last four hours. This would add to the clock's radial symmetry.
  

[integralac 2566]

mene u skoli nisu tako ucili, a ni wiki tad nije postojao, ali eto sad znam

[Woodoo 22985]

[ivan.ik 625]

mene u skoli nisu tako ucili, a ni wiki tad nije postojao, ali eto sad znam

I mene učili da rimski brojevi imaju samo do tri ponavljanja, zato su bili ograničeni do tri hiljade i kusur. Ono verovatno kinezi nisu najbolje shvatili Marka Pola ili im jednostavno falilo V a ovo sa četiri IIII se svidelo pa zadržali do danas.

Bolje kad iz nezadovoljstva pokažu kolektivno zadnjice.

[beli_Punto 123]

Ruski ako ne znate naucicete

Edited December 3, 2012 by beli_Punto

[kicerica 5]

[Dr. Tuborg 37]

[Woodoo 22985]

[kicerica 5]

ovo je vrh

[Mijailović P. 3450]

Pa sve vreme sam imao utisak da poznajem ove NA-crtane likove a sad' mi je i potpuno jasno da sam bio u pravu !

[kicerica 5]

Eto vidis odakle krade veliki brat.

[SikterBre 31]

[silenci 2337]

eee ovo mene treba da ocistim sneg,jel od snega nemogu da isteram auto iz garaze uzas

[miske17 0]

jesi probao lopatom?